Community
    • Login

    Feature request: enable key bindings without modifier keys

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
    shortcutfeature requestkeyboard
    17 Posts 6 Posters 5.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Mikhail VM
      Mikhail V @NippurDeLagash
      last edited by

      @NippurDeLagash said:

      Like Claudia and Scott, I do not see the point of adding vi features into Notepad++.

      Gentlemen, let’s please keep the conversation constructive and non-biased.
      Your personal problems with VIM are not relevant here. I am not asking
      about VI plugin, I am adressing concrete issues.
      Ergonomics of input is not VIM’s invention, it is just common sense for
      any software with heavy input requirements.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Mikhail VM
        Mikhail V @Scott Sumner
        last edited by

        @Scott-Sumner said:

        So the OP is asking for this “command versus input mode” as a standard feature (won’t ever happen) but for requests like this, plugins are really where it belongs.

        Ok, this is closer the the topic. So does it mean, I can write a Plugin which catches keyboard events and blocking
        them from going further? I.e. for a split mode to work, it must catch or pass the events depending on
        which mode i am currently in. Probably you can give some examples on plugins with this functionality?

        Something like the OP’s desire (or even “WordStar emulation”) is easily achieved in Pythonscript for example.

        Pythonscript as I understand can address editor component, but it seems it has nothing to do with catching/redirecting keyboard input on a lower level than the editor. Or am I wrong?

        1% features don’t belong in the standard product, and this is a 1% or less feature (meaning useful to very few users).

        Let me gently propose not to guess that. Users are such interesting people - you give them a feature,
        they use it for some time, then you give them a better feature and they start with that common “we want our bad old feature back”. But probably they will like it? When I was starting with VIM I thought -
        what the heck? these stupid modes? But only later I did realize why it is made so.
        If I were to make up a new editor I would definitly include at least a navigation mode.

        Scott SumnerS Claudia FrankC 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Scott SumnerS
          Scott Sumner @Mikhail V
          last edited by

          @Mikhail-V

          If I were to make up a new editor

          I think that is a key point. Notepad++ is NOT a NEW editor; and its keymapping model is what it is. I don’t see it changing but I am not a developer on it. :-D

          does it mean, I can write a Plugin which catches keyboard events and blocking

          Yes.

          Pythonscript as I understand can address editor component, but it seems it has nothing to do with catching/redirecting keyboard input on a lower level than the editor.

          It is possible to do some amazing low-level things with the PS plugin. When I said “easily achieved in Pythonscript” I meant the base method: getting to keypresses BEFORE Notepad++ itself can act on them–you hook the Notepad++ message loop (using the ctypes functions) so that your Python sees the messages first, look for keyboard related (WM_KEYDOWN, etal) messages, and consume them so that N++ doesn’t see them (or not) in the Python code–and of course do any additional processing necessary for two modes. Beyond that I haven’t thought too much about it as, like I said, such a dual-mode input scheme doesn’t interest me.

          And okay, maybe it isn’t “easy” if you haven’t done it or seen it, but there are examples here on this site that serve to demystify it.

          Let me gently propose not to guess that. Users are such interesting people - you give them a feature,
          they use it for some time, then you give them a better feature and they start with that common “we want our bad old feature back”. But probably they will like it?

          I cannot argue…these are valid points. :-)

          Good luck with your campaign for this type of input. You are discussing it in a good place, but if you want to really request it your best option is to make a feature request or a change-in-functionality request here: https://github.com/notepad-plus-plus/notepad-plus-plus/issues/ by opening a “New issue”.

          Mikhail VM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • Claudia FrankC
            Claudia Frank @Mikhail V
            last edited by

            @Mikhail-V

            just to make it clear - my comment was basically a question of understanding and shouldn’t be
            taken as an offense.

            I still can’t see the benefit, but hey, that’s me, others might find it useful and as Scott already wrote,
            make the request at github so the main developer(s) do get noticed and if you are lucky it will
            get implemented one day.

            Cheers
            Claudia

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • Mikhail VM
              Mikhail V @Scott Sumner
              last edited by

              @Scott-Sumner said:

              Good luck with your campaign for this type of input. You are discussing it in a good place

              Thanks. I have asked before about this on tracker but did not become any comments, so here at least you gave some good info. Making a plugin (I cannot do it) or fighting for a feature without knowing it is needed by users is no necesary.

              I only was a bit confused how it is not clear why such things are useful in general.
              Just looking into recent posts here on forum - people who (it seemed to me) like single keys to get to “search next” or “replace” commands in the search dialog and have to switch the context away from text input line (that’s how native widgets define behaviour I suppose). I am always instinctively finding these small tricks to release strain by repeated commands.
              This indicates the general idea which I was trying to deliver.

              I mean, think of current editing like text area and a side panel with a huge command list, but you can get into the panel with commands only by holding Ctrl.
              It is easy in some cases when the right hand is on the keybord (just hold RightCtrl),
              but not easy at all when using the mouse+keyboard or repeated commands.

              Hmmm. [thoughtfully scratching my beard]

              Now I am looking into Autohotkey app, it has capabilities to achieve similar results to what I want. Emulating, say, {Ctrl down} state globally and toggling it, I could warp directly into shortcuts that are defined with Ctrl, so that may work.
              I am not sure about that 100 prcent, and how bad side-effects can be, but if it works, it’s a workaround for me.
              But thats of course just “simulating” in best case. OTOH it is “for free”, compared to
              plugin development.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • bycn82 bbbbB
                bycn82 bbbb
                last edited by

                as a heavy vi editor user, I think what you described is definitely a brilliant idea about how to improve the input performance. and after inspired by your ideas, i wrote a plugin as you suggested. and it is named vi simulator. please check https://github.com/bycn82/visimulator/

                Mikhail VM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • chcgC
                  chcg
                  last edited by

                  @bycn82-bbbb Is this related to the old visimulator mentioned at http://docs.notepad-plus-plus.org/index.php/Plugin_Central#V? Or a newly written one?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Mikhail VM
                    Mikhail V @bycn82 bbbb
                    last edited by

                    @bycn82-bbbb
                    Hi, thanks for the note.
                    So I see a dll file on the page. Just to make it clear - is your plugin a configurable tool?
                    There is no any info, besides a list of commands.
                    Say I need to switch from normal to edit mode first, and of course I need
                    a way to bind keys to toggle modes. Then I would start binding keys in normal mode.
                    But it seems you have all keys hardcoded as in default VIM install?
                    If so then I can’t make much use of it unfortunately.

                    bycn82 bbbbB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • bycn82 bbbbB
                      bycn82 bbbb
                      last edited by

                      @chcg It is a newly written one, the previous version is lost.

                      I rewrite a new one because I need to use it with notepad++ x64 version.

                      type "ESC" 3 times to enable/disable the plugin. after that, it is same as previous version.

                      Don’t have time to implement all the features, If you have any requirement, please let me know.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • chcgC
                        chcg
                        last edited by

                        @bycn82-bbbb See further questions ar https://github.com/bycn82/visimulator/issues/1

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • bycn82 bbbbB
                          bycn82 bbbb @Mikhail V
                          last edited by

                          @Mikhail-V Configurable? You can only config to keep it or delete it I think.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          The Community of users of the Notepad++ text editor.
                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors